On 5/20/2024 10:27 PM, Baochen Qiang wrote: > > > On 5/21/2024 1:12 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> On 5/20/2024 11:34 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: >>>> Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>>> On 5/11/2024 5:54 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Oh, this fell through the cracks. Commit bc8a0fac8677 was introduced in >>>>>> v6.9-rc1 so I should have sent this to v6.9 but it's too late now. I'll >>>>>> need to queue this for v6.10 via wireless tree. >>>>>> >>>>>> Adding the regression also to regzbot: >>>>>> >>>>>> #regzbot introduced: bc8a0fac8677 >>>>>> #regzbot title: ath11k: connection to 6 GHz AP fails >>>>>> >>>>> Hi Kalle, with an upcoming patch this regression is expected to be fixed: >>>>> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240506214536.310434f55f76.I6aca291ee06265e3f63e0f9024ba19a850b53a33@changeid/#t >>>>> >>>>> So here the ath11k fix would not be needed any more once above patch got merged. >>>> >>>> What happens if we apply both patch 'wifi: ath11k: move power type check >>>> to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' and patchset 'wifi: >>>> mac80211: build TPE handling'? In other words, do they conflict from >>>> functionality point of view? >>> >>> No functional conflict, 6 GHz AP connection would also succeed with >>> both of them applied. >> >> Ok, thanks. In that case I would like take patch 'wifi: ath11k: move >> power type check to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' to >> ath-current branch from which it will go to v6.10. Is that ok for >> everyone? > Good to me. Good to me, too
