On 5/21/2024 1:12 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On 5/20/2024 11:34 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: >>> Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> On 5/11/2024 5:54 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: >>>> >>>>> Oh, this fell through the cracks. Commit bc8a0fac8677 was introduced in >>>>> v6.9-rc1 so I should have sent this to v6.9 but it's too late now. I'll >>>>> need to queue this for v6.10 via wireless tree. >>>>> >>>>> Adding the regression also to regzbot: >>>>> >>>>> #regzbot introduced: bc8a0fac8677 >>>>> #regzbot title: ath11k: connection to 6 GHz AP fails >>>>> >>>> Hi Kalle, with an upcoming patch this regression is expected to be fixed: >>>> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240506214536.310434f55f76.I6aca291ee06265e3f63e0f9024ba19a850b53a33@changeid/#t >>>> >>>> So here the ath11k fix would not be needed any more once above patch got merged. >>> >>> What happens if we apply both patch 'wifi: ath11k: move power type check >>> to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' and patchset 'wifi: >>> mac80211: build TPE handling'? In other words, do they conflict from >>> functionality point of view? >> >> No functional conflict, 6 GHz AP connection would also succeed with >> both of them applied. > > Ok, thanks. In that case I would like take patch 'wifi: ath11k: move > power type check to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' to > ath-current branch from which it will go to v6.10. Is that ok for > everyone? Good to me. >
