Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 5/20/2024 11:34 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> On 5/11/2024 5:54 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: >>> >>>> Oh, this fell through the cracks. Commit bc8a0fac8677 was introduced in >>>> v6.9-rc1 so I should have sent this to v6.9 but it's too late now. I'll >>>> need to queue this for v6.10 via wireless tree. >>>> >>>> Adding the regression also to regzbot: >>>> >>>> #regzbot introduced: bc8a0fac8677 >>>> #regzbot title: ath11k: connection to 6 GHz AP fails >>>> >>> Hi Kalle, with an upcoming patch this regression is expected to be fixed: >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240506214536.310434f55f76.I6aca291ee06265e3f63e0f9024ba19a850b53a33@changeid/#t >>> >>> So here the ath11k fix would not be needed any more once above patch got merged. >> >> What happens if we apply both patch 'wifi: ath11k: move power type check >> to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' and patchset 'wifi: >> mac80211: build TPE handling'? In other words, do they conflict from >> functionality point of view? > > No functional conflict, 6 GHz AP connection would also succeed with > both of them applied. Ok, thanks. In that case I would like take patch 'wifi: ath11k: move power type check to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' to ath-current branch from which it will go to v6.10. Is that ok for everyone? -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
