> On 2/8/24 7:28 AM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 10:08 -0800, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Old code would not set it to disabled, just assumed that driver
> > > > would default to disabled. Change this to explicitly request
> > > > bss color be flushed on initial driver configuration.
> > >
> > > Arguably, the current behaviour is in line with the documentation of
> > > BSS_CHANGED_HE_BSS_COLOR ... but I would tend to agree that
> > > enabling/disabling coloring should be covered by it as well. Lorenzo?
> > >
> > > > And I think the beacon-change logic was slightly wrong, so adjust
> > > > that as well.
> > >
> > > That's not a great thing for a commit message to say ...
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > net/mac80211/cfg.c | 10 +++++-----
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> > > > index 1c7fb0959cfd..1a6c6c764cbc 100644
> > > > --- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> > > > +++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> > > > @@ -1331,8 +1331,7 @@ static int ieee80211_start_ap(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
> > > > IEEE80211_HE_OPERATION_RTS_THRESHOLD_MASK);
> > > > changed |= BSS_CHANGED_HE_OBSS_PD;
> > > > - if (params->beacon.he_bss_color.enabled)
> > > > - changed |= BSS_CHANGED_HE_BSS_COLOR;
> > > > + changed |= BSS_CHANGED_HE_BSS_COLOR;
> >
> > I think we should use beacon->he_bss_color_valid here instead of
> > params->beacon.he_bss_color.enabled, agree?
>
> Either way, the value changed from un-set/un-known to some value, so why not just
> mark it changed and flush to the driver?
IIUC what you mean here, if bss color changes from an un-set/un-known to a
configured (valid) value, beacon->he_bss_color_valid will be true
(he_bss_color_valid is used to indicate userspace provided a proper color for
beacons). What is the difference?
The other way around ("undo" some leftover color from a previous run), it
seems a driver/fw bug, and it must be fixed there. Don't you think?
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> >
> > > > }
> > > > if (params->he_cap) {
> > > > @@ -1512,6 +1511,7 @@ static int ieee80211_change_beacon(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
> > > > int err;
> > > > struct ieee80211_bss_conf *link_conf;
> > > > u64 changed = 0;
> > > > + bool color_en;
> > > > lockdep_assert_wiphy(wiphy);
> > > > @@ -1549,9 +1549,9 @@ static int ieee80211_change_beacon(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
> > > > return err;
> > > > changed |= err;
> > > > - if (beacon->he_bss_color_valid &&
> > > > - beacon->he_bss_color.enabled != link_conf->he_bss_color.enabled) {
> > > > - link_conf->he_bss_color.enabled = beacon->he_bss_color.enabled;
> > > > + color_en = beacon->he_bss_color.enabled && beacon->he_bss_color_valid;
> > > > + if (color_en != link_conf->he_bss_color.enabled) {
> > > > + link_conf->he_bss_color.enabled = color_en;
> > > > changed |= BSS_CHANGED_HE_BSS_COLOR;
> > > > }
> >
> > this seems fine to me. >
> > Regards,
> > Lorenzo
> >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Not sure how this isn't updating the color itself, Lorenzo?
> > >
> > > johannes
> > >
>
>
> --
> Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
