> On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 10:08 -0800, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Old code would not set it to disabled, just assumed that driver
> > would default to disabled. Change this to explicitly request
> > bss color be flushed on initial driver configuration.
>
> Arguably, the current behaviour is in line with the documentation of
> BSS_CHANGED_HE_BSS_COLOR ... but I would tend to agree that
> enabling/disabling coloring should be covered by it as well. Lorenzo?
>
> > And I think the beacon-change logic was slightly wrong, so adjust
> > that as well.
>
> That's not a great thing for a commit message to say ...
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > net/mac80211/cfg.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> > index 1c7fb0959cfd..1a6c6c764cbc 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> > @@ -1331,8 +1331,7 @@ static int ieee80211_start_ap(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
> > IEEE80211_HE_OPERATION_RTS_THRESHOLD_MASK);
> > changed |= BSS_CHANGED_HE_OBSS_PD;
> >
> > - if (params->beacon.he_bss_color.enabled)
> > - changed |= BSS_CHANGED_HE_BSS_COLOR;
> > + changed |= BSS_CHANGED_HE_BSS_COLOR;
I think we should use beacon->he_bss_color_valid here instead of
params->beacon.he_bss_color.enabled, agree?
> > }
> >
> > if (params->he_cap) {
> > @@ -1512,6 +1511,7 @@ static int ieee80211_change_beacon(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
> > int err;
> > struct ieee80211_bss_conf *link_conf;
> > u64 changed = 0;
> > + bool color_en;
> >
> > lockdep_assert_wiphy(wiphy);
> >
> > @@ -1549,9 +1549,9 @@ static int ieee80211_change_beacon(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
> > return err;
> > changed |= err;
> >
> > - if (beacon->he_bss_color_valid &&
> > - beacon->he_bss_color.enabled != link_conf->he_bss_color.enabled) {
> > - link_conf->he_bss_color.enabled = beacon->he_bss_color.enabled;
> > + color_en = beacon->he_bss_color.enabled && beacon->he_bss_color_valid;
> > + if (color_en != link_conf->he_bss_color.enabled) {
> > + link_conf->he_bss_color.enabled = color_en;
> > changed |= BSS_CHANGED_HE_BSS_COLOR;
> > }
this seems fine to me.
Regards,
Lorenzo
> >
>
> Not sure how this isn't updating the color itself, Lorenzo?
>
> johannes
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
