Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 22:27 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > > BTW who defines "Dynamic Power Save"? Is there a standard approach or > more an implementation approach to the concept of doing PS while > active? > >>> PS should be disabled while associated and running software scan, and >>> naturally re-enabled after the scan has finished. I assume hardware >>> scanning implementations are clever enough to disable PS when scanning >>> and we don't have to worry about that case. > > BTW we need to check if in ath5k/ath9k if the beacon miss interrupt > will actually be triggered *if* the beacon filter is *off*. Not sure > about this yet. Also I'm not sure if triggering scanning will enable > beaconing filter in our hardware if its off and then disable it after > scanning too. The beacon miss interrupt is independent of the beacon filter. In fact that's the whole point of the interrupt itself. I know that this works in hardware, we only need to check the software side of it ;) - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
