On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 22:27 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: BTW who defines "Dynamic Power Save"? Is there a standard approach or more an implementation approach to the concept of doing PS while active? >> PS should be disabled while associated and running software scan, and >> naturally re-enabled after the scan has finished. I assume hardware >> scanning implementations are clever enough to disable PS when scanning >> and we don't have to worry about that case. BTW we need to check if in ath5k/ath9k if the beacon miss interrupt will actually be triggered *if* the beacon filter is *off*. Not sure about this yet. Also I'm not sure if triggering scanning will enable beaconing filter in our hardware if its off and then disable it after scanning too. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
