On 6/21/2022 3:18 PM, Danny van Heumen wrote:
Hi Arend, ------- Original Message ------- On Tuesday, June 21st, 2022 at 09:41, Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:[..] Maybe overlooked, but I have not seen a patch from you on the linux-wireless list. Do you have reference, ie. URL or Message-ID?I'm not sure what's most convenient here, but here's an archive link: https://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=165547582612979 Message-ID: ThT2jwvySn9tFQm9FxrlPNMQkiGUnx_87cOhmmeexoVOFZqOkpjmAntCWG- kIBMj2830LHZaOULlJxQKiRXkVtGYrrT8rBaB7R65qjIinYo= () dannyvanheumen ! nl
Found it. Had to check my gmail account instead of my work account.
You haven't commented yet on my question regarding definition macro for the clm_blob. I intend to send a patch for it, because I believe _at the very least_ some parts of distribution processes rely on these firmware entries. It would be good if you can confirm.
The clm_blob is optional unless the firmware image was built without any clm data. If that is the case for 43456 (I think it is not) than it should be reflected with BRCMF_FW_CLM_DEF(). Otherwise it is fine as it is right now.
Thanks, Arend
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
