On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 23:46 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Sure but an issue here is that if we do deal with band-specific > regulatory domain definitions we change the regulatory behavior from > being "disallow everything first" to "allow everything first, disable > everything in the band for which we encounter a rule in except what > the rule allows". > > Since the regulatory definitions in db.txt are in KHz we are allowing > it to grow as more technology pops up with support for more bands. I > think the first approach was better. The current suggestion of only > applying rules if a band reg definition is present is only to deal > with a rare case. I think its better we try to handle that instead and > keep our existing behaviour. Ack on both points, which is why I said "If we're going to [...]". I don't think I've seen a convincing use case for this other than test environments, in which you can very well just use crda. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
