On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 23:33 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Well the code specifically disregards secondary regulatory_hint()'s > right now and we reviewed why -- we discussed it at OLS and agreed to > go with the first one as that will usually be the built in one. That's > why. The restrictive thing to do next to handle more cards better is > to keep doing intersections. If we're going to disregard 5 GHz for the first hint if there's no information on it, then we should take the first hint containing 5 GHz information seriously imho. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
