On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 22:01 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 21:28 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > > >> > And please keep the 10 pairs -> 20 addresses, it's a lot easier to > >> > understand :) > > > >> I don't like on this solution two things one is that it 32 bit > >> variables sits on unaligned address > > > > That doesn't matter at all since it's packed, and the bitwise accesses > > you did previously are way less efficient. > > This is not packet this is shared memory. ?? The struct is _packed_, nothing to do with packets. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
