Hi, Kalle, On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 12:49, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > And did the "bad" performance even have any real visible changes to the > user? IMHO this "bad" performance is small price to pay from getting > WPA3 supported out-of-box, especially when the data throughput is > unaffected. I agree, I also believe the additional security provided by WPA3 is more important. The CPU overhead impact exists and is measurable but, to be honest, I didn't notice any worse performance while browsing the web, for example (which is already slow enough on a G4 CPU, as you can imagine). Thanks, Rui
