On 03/13/2020 9:17, Soeren Moch wrote:
On 13.03.20 12:03, Chi-Hsien Lin wrote:
On 12/16/2019 7:43, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Soeren,
Am Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019, 22:24:10 CET schrieb Soeren Moch:
On 12.12.19 11:59, Soeren Moch wrote:
On 12.12.19 10:42, Kalle Valo wrote:
Soeren Moch <smoch@xxxxxx> writes:
Add support for the BCM4359 chipset with SDIO interface and RSDB
support
to the brcmfmac wireless network driver in patches 1-7.
Enhance devicetree of the RockPro64 arm64/rockchip board to use an
AP6359SA based wifi/bt combo module with this chipset in patches
8-9.
Chung-Hsien Hsu (1):
brcmfmac: set F2 blocksize and watermark for 4359
Soeren Moch (5):
brcmfmac: fix rambase for 4359/9
brcmfmac: make errors when setting roaming parameters non-fatal
brcmfmac: add support for BCM4359 SDIO chipset
arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: enable wifi module at sdio0
arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: hook up bluetooth at uart0
Wright Feng (3):
brcmfmac: reset two D11 cores if chip has two D11 cores
brcmfmac: add RSDB condition when setting interface combinations
brcmfmac: not set mbss in vif if firmware does not support MBSS
.../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts | 50 +++++++++++---
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 8 ++-
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 68
+++++++++++++++----
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c | 54 ++++++++++++++-
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.h | 1 +
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c | 2 +-
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 17 +++++
include/linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h | 2 +
8 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Just to make sure we are on the same page, I will apply patches
1-7 to
wireless-drivers-next and patches 8-9 go to some other tree? And
there
are no dependencies between the brcmfmac patches and dts patches?
Yes, this also is my understanding. I'm glad if you are fine with
patches 1-7.
Heiko will pick up patches 8-9 later for linux-rockchip independently.
And if we need another round of review for patches 8-9, I think we
don't
need to bother linux-wireless with this.
Heiko,
is this OK for you when patches 1-7 are merged now in wireless-drivers,
and then I send a v3 for patches 8-9 only for you to merge in
linux-rockchip later? Or do you prefer a full v3 for the whole series
with only this pending clock name update in patch 9?
Nope, merging 1-7 from this v2 and then getting a v3 with only the dts
stuff is perfectly fine :-)
Soeren,
I suppose patch 1-7 from this serious are all good for merging. Is
that right? If so, could you please create a rebased V3?
Chi-hsien,
Thanks for asking, but these patches are already merged in
torvalds/v5.6-rc1 as commits
1b8d2e0a9e42..2635853ce4ab
So everything already fine with this.
Ahh... You're right. They're all good. Thanks a lot!!
Thanks,
Soeren
Regards,
Chi-hsien Lin
Heiko
.
