On 12.12.19 11:59, Soeren Moch wrote: > On 12.12.19 10:42, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Soeren Moch <smoch@xxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Add support for the BCM4359 chipset with SDIO interface and RSDB support >>> to the brcmfmac wireless network driver in patches 1-7. >>> >>> Enhance devicetree of the RockPro64 arm64/rockchip board to use an >>> AP6359SA based wifi/bt combo module with this chipset in patches 8-9. >>> >>> >>> Chung-Hsien Hsu (1): >>> brcmfmac: set F2 blocksize and watermark for 4359 >>> >>> Soeren Moch (5): >>> brcmfmac: fix rambase for 4359/9 >>> brcmfmac: make errors when setting roaming parameters non-fatal >>> brcmfmac: add support for BCM4359 SDIO chipset >>> arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: enable wifi module at sdio0 >>> arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: hook up bluetooth at uart0 >>> >>> Wright Feng (3): >>> brcmfmac: reset two D11 cores if chip has two D11 cores >>> brcmfmac: add RSDB condition when setting interface combinations >>> brcmfmac: not set mbss in vif if firmware does not support MBSS >>> >>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts | 50 +++++++++++--- >>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 8 ++- >>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 68 +++++++++++++++---- >>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c | 54 ++++++++++++++- >>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.h | 1 + >>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c | 2 +- >>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 17 +++++ >>> include/linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h | 2 + >>> 8 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) >> Just to make sure we are on the same page, I will apply patches 1-7 to >> wireless-drivers-next and patches 8-9 go to some other tree? And there >> are no dependencies between the brcmfmac patches and dts patches? >> > Yes, this also is my understanding. I'm glad if you are fine with > patches 1-7. > Heiko will pick up patches 8-9 later for linux-rockchip independently. > And if we need another round of review for patches 8-9, I think we don't > need to bother linux-wireless with this. Heiko, is this OK for you when patches 1-7 are merged now in wireless-drivers, and then I send a v3 for patches 8-9 only for you to merge in linux-rockchip later? Or do you prefer a full v3 for the whole series with only this pending clock name update in patch 9? Thanks, Soeren
