Hi Soeren, Am Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019, 22:24:10 CET schrieb Soeren Moch: > On 12.12.19 11:59, Soeren Moch wrote: > > On 12.12.19 10:42, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> Soeren Moch <smoch@xxxxxx> writes: > >> > >>> Add support for the BCM4359 chipset with SDIO interface and RSDB support > >>> to the brcmfmac wireless network driver in patches 1-7. > >>> > >>> Enhance devicetree of the RockPro64 arm64/rockchip board to use an > >>> AP6359SA based wifi/bt combo module with this chipset in patches 8-9. > >>> > >>> > >>> Chung-Hsien Hsu (1): > >>> brcmfmac: set F2 blocksize and watermark for 4359 > >>> > >>> Soeren Moch (5): > >>> brcmfmac: fix rambase for 4359/9 > >>> brcmfmac: make errors when setting roaming parameters non-fatal > >>> brcmfmac: add support for BCM4359 SDIO chipset > >>> arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: enable wifi module at sdio0 > >>> arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: hook up bluetooth at uart0 > >>> > >>> Wright Feng (3): > >>> brcmfmac: reset two D11 cores if chip has two D11 cores > >>> brcmfmac: add RSDB condition when setting interface combinations > >>> brcmfmac: not set mbss in vif if firmware does not support MBSS > >>> > >>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts | 50 +++++++++++--- > >>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 8 ++- > >>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 68 +++++++++++++++---- > >>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c | 54 ++++++++++++++- > >>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.h | 1 + > >>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c | 2 +- > >>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 17 +++++ > >>> include/linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h | 2 + > >>> 8 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > >> Just to make sure we are on the same page, I will apply patches 1-7 to > >> wireless-drivers-next and patches 8-9 go to some other tree? And there > >> are no dependencies between the brcmfmac patches and dts patches? > >> > > Yes, this also is my understanding. I'm glad if you are fine with > > patches 1-7. > > Heiko will pick up patches 8-9 later for linux-rockchip independently. > > And if we need another round of review for patches 8-9, I think we don't > > need to bother linux-wireless with this. > > Heiko, > > is this OK for you when patches 1-7 are merged now in wireless-drivers, > and then I send a v3 for patches 8-9 only for you to merge in > linux-rockchip later? Or do you prefer a full v3 for the whole series > with only this pending clock name update in patch 9? Nope, merging 1-7 from this v2 and then getting a v3 with only the dts stuff is perfectly fine :-) Heiko
