On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 16:43 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > No the mistake is on your side. FIFO is not relevant here. What is > important is whether HW queue is full or not. > Except the AC Back off scheduling done by FIFO there is BA protocol > which my stall HW queue. It doesn't mean that other packets with the > same FIFO should be stalled. You need additional SW queue that can be > stopped. HW queues are irrelevant, you're the only vendor that implements it with HW queues. If you think they're required for correct operation, clearly you're wrong. I'm just trying to fix the bugs and find a way to do this with hardware that doesn't have extra HW queues. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
