On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Say a station enables aggregation on a low-priority TID, manages to fill >> the hw queue because high-prio frames are eating up all the airtime and >> then disables aggregation again. Now another station enables aggregation >> on a high-priority TID, and gets assigned to the same hw queue. Now >> frames for that station will be stalled, no? Seems like a bug to me. aggregation queue can still can tx packets in singles so such stall doesn't happen even in theory. > Never mind, the queue won't get reassigned. I was just confused by a > bunch of superfluous code in iwl-tx.c. You cannot ever run into having > IWL_EMPTYING_HW_QUEUE_ADDBA set because you wait for the queue to drain > before fully disabling it. Correct. Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
