Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 11:50 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > [snip, you really should try that sometimes ;-)] > >> ieee80211_queue_skb() calls ieee80211_get_txq() which treats skb- >> datalike it contains an 802.11 header. That is probably not the >> intention here, is it? > > Indeed, that makes no sense. > >> I guess we could augment the TXQ stuctures to also handle 802.3 frames >> (and introduce ieee80211_queue_skb_8023())? Or would it be better to >> have a qdisc on 802.3-mode interfaces and push packets back to that? I >> guess we'd still benefit from per-station queueing of packets even if >> they are Ethernet frames, which would mean amending the TXQs would be >> better? > > TXQs would be better, yes. We should do that. Cool. Glad that we agree ;) -Toke
