On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:20:07PM +0200, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > On upstream tree where this patch is intended > > additional registers where never programmed as proper branch > > were never used, because of additional check in RT5390 branch. > > > > on my hardware additional registers were programmed in regardless of > redundant check. that why i opened whole thread on forum since i > couldn't understand how's that happening I don't understand how that possible either. > > Patch does only change TX_SW_CFG* regs values for RT6352. > > > > i'd still prefer that we include CONFIG_RT2800SOC, and if required > move rest of the registers to that check, because at least on my > hardware driver would still recognize chip as RT5390 despite the > RT6352 defines As I pointed before you should add additional printk's and provide dmesg to make us see what is going on. Thanks Stanislaw
