On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 11:41:33AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:32:12AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >> > Add Kconfig and Makefiles for mt76x0 driver. Now the driver > >> > can be build. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > --- > >> > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ > >> > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Makefile | 1 + > >> > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/Makefile | 7 +++++++ > >> > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+) > >> > create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/Makefile > >> > > >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig > >> > index 69906c733a1c..850611ad347a 100644 > >> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig > >> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig > >> > @@ -9,6 +9,13 @@ config MT76x2_COMMON > >> > tristate > >> > depends on MT76_CORE > >> > > >> > +config MT76x0U > >> > + tristate "MediaTek MT76x0U (USB) support" > >> > + depends on MAC80211 > >> > + depends on USB > >> > + help > >> > + This adds support for MT7610U-based wireless USB dongles. > >> > >> Does it make sense to add a Kconfig option for every mt76 device? I'm > >> worried that soon we have over a dozen of them. I can understand having > >> separate options to enable PCI or USB devices, but I don't see the > >> benefit for anything more finegrained than that. > > > > I think it does make sense for AP/home routers and other embedded > > devices. > > How much of memory savings are we talking about? Currently mt76x0.ko module is 285 KB big on x86_64 after debug symbols strip (with debug symbols size is 6MB). Stanislaw