Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Add Kconfig and Makefiles for mt76x0 driver. Now the driver > can be build. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/Makefile | 7 +++++++ > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/Makefile > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig > index 69906c733a1c..850611ad347a 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig > @@ -9,6 +9,13 @@ config MT76x2_COMMON > tristate > depends on MT76_CORE > > +config MT76x0U > + tristate "MediaTek MT76x0U (USB) support" > + depends on MAC80211 > + depends on USB > + help > + This adds support for MT7610U-based wireless USB dongles. Does it make sense to add a Kconfig option for every mt76 device? I'm worried that soon we have over a dozen of them. I can understand having separate options to enable PCI or USB devices, but I don't see the benefit for anything more finegrained than that. -- Kalle Valo
