On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:32:12AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Add Kconfig and Makefiles for mt76x0 driver. Now the driver > > can be build. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/Makefile | 7 +++++++ > > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/Makefile > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig > > index 69906c733a1c..850611ad347a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig > > @@ -9,6 +9,13 @@ config MT76x2_COMMON > > tristate > > depends on MT76_CORE > > > > +config MT76x0U > > + tristate "MediaTek MT76x0U (USB) support" > > + depends on MAC80211 > > + depends on USB > > + help > > + This adds support for MT7610U-based wireless USB dongles. > > Does it make sense to add a Kconfig option for every mt76 device? I'm > worried that soon we have over a dozen of them. I can understand having > separate options to enable PCI or USB devices, but I don't see the > benefit for anything more finegrained than that. I think it does make sense for AP/home routers and other embedded devices. Stanislaw
