On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 20:12 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/patches/kernel/all/2008-07-09-17%3a38/022-mac80211-fix-hwseq.patch > > Personally I have my doubts about the meaningfullness of the flag > IEEE80211_TX_CTL_QOS_FRAME > since drivers will probably use ieee80211_is_data_qos() instead. > Perhaps it is better to have the flag named something like: > IEEE80211_TX_CTS_SW_SEQUENCE > or > IEEE80211_TX_CTS_HAS_SEQUENCE > > That way it is a bit clearer what the intention of the flag is. Yeah, that's probably true, though I'd like people to be aware of the TID sequence stuff... Guess we need to write more docs. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
