On Tue, 2018-06-19 at 22:04 -0500, Denis Kenzior wrote: > > Right, but you’re much more aware of all the locking issues than I am. :-) > > Clearly this comes from cfg80211 without any locking other than rtnl, so > > you don't have preemption disabled. That's the minimum needed to get rid > > of the warning you found. > > In my defense, I did ask you whether there are any potential locking > issues in the RFC and you didn’t think there were any. Yep, I missed that too. More precisely, ISTR actually thinking about it and deciding it was fine, so ... my bad for sure. > I posted a fix for this. Could you please review? I think it's fine. I'll make a pass later today/this week and send patches upstream. johannes
