Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 02:44:03PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 06:02:48PM +0530, Govind Singh wrote: >> > On 2018-06-12 17:45, Govind Singh wrote: >> > > >> > > ATH10K_SNOC builds just fine with COMPILE_TEST, so make that possible. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > --- >> > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig | 3 ++- >> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > > >> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig >> > > b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig >> > > index 54ff5930126c..6572a43590a8 100644 >> > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig >> > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig >> > > @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ config ATH10K_USB >> > > >> > > config ATH10K_SNOC >> > > tristate "Qualcomm ath10k SNOC support (EXPERIMENTAL)" >> > > - depends on ATH10K && ARCH_QCOM >> > > + depends on ATH10K >> > > + depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST >> > > ---help--- >> > > This module adds support for integrated WCN3990 chip connected >> > > to system NOC(SNOC). Currently work in progress and will not >> > >> > Thanks Niklas for enabling COMPILE_TEST. With QMI set of >> > changes(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10448183/), we need to enable >> > COMPILE_TEST for >> > QCOM_SCM/QMI_HELPERS which seems broken today. Are you planning to fix the >> > same. > > This patch is good as is. > > However, Govind's QMI patch set together with this patch > resulted in build errors. > > FTR, these are fixed by: > https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152880985402356 > https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152889452326350 So the problem is that if I apply this patch I can't apply Govind's QMI patchset (due to the build problems) until Niklas' fixes to qcom and rpmsg subsystems propogate back to my tree and that might take weeks, or even months. But I really would like to apply the QMI patchset ASAP so that we can complete the wcn3990 support and not unnecessarily delay it. So what I propose is that I put this patch 2 as 'Awaiting Upstream' in patchwork and apply it once Niklas' patches get to my tree. Does that sound good? -- Kalle Valo
