Re: [RFC 3/2] get rid of rx handler function pointers

[Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > #define CALL_RXH(rxh) if ((res = rxh(rx)) != RX_CONTINUE) goto rxh_done;
> 
> Would it really be so bad to just open-code them rather than the macro approach?
> 
> 	res = ieee80211_rx_h_passive_scan(rx);
> 	if (res != RX_CONTINUE) goto rxh_done;
> 
> 	res = ieee80211_rx_h_check(rx);
> 	if (res != RX_CONTINUE) goto rxh_done;
> 
> 	...
> 
> 
> Similar comment for the transmit handler patch.  

Well, I was lazy, and figured it'd be easier to add new ones that way if
needed.

> Either way, the approach looks good,
> and the size reduction is nice.

:)

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part