On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 12:58 +0200, Lazar, Alexei Avshalom wrote: > > What you're doing here is *extremely* vague. No definitions of what > > this means, no description of how it's intended to be implemented, > > no note even on whether or not this is for full-MAC chips or not, > > etc. > > > > The patch is intended for full-MAC chips and I will update the commit > message to include more details. > > > At least for mac80211, we can define signals to userspace regarding > > "link quality" and make decisions in wpa_s then? > > > > The policy is offloaded today to the FW and the decision being made > by the FW. > We are only modifying the behavior and not making the decision. Fair enough, but I stand by saying that it's extremely vague - how could userspace possibly know what "level" to pick, if you don't give it any information about what the levels really mean? johannes
