On Monday 19 December 2016 05:15 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > "Thiagarajan, Vasanthakumar" <vthiagar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Thursday 15 December 2016 07:23 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: >>> >>>>> I agree. Dynamic switch part is buggy, we can start with not >>>>> allowing interfaces resulting in dynamic switch. >>>> >>>> Does this mean that when bringing up multiple interfaces, users would >>>> need to figure out the 'magic' order that works? >>> >>> I think we need to talk about hardware capabilities at this point. >> >> QCA988X does not have capability to configure vif specific decap mode. Encap mode >> is configurable per packet for all the ath10k based chips so this part should be >> fine to support per vif configuration. Newer QCA chips like QCA9984, QCA4019, QCA9888 >> and QCA99X0 supports decap mode configuration per vif. > > When you say "all" are you also taking into account QCA6174 and QCA9377? Good point. I see some workarounds for QCA6174 to send data frames in ethernet mode, so QCA6174 should be fine in this regard. I assume QCA9377 also works fine with ethernet encap configuration per htt desc, need to confirm. Vasanth
