"Thiagarajan, Vasanthakumar" <vthiagar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thursday 15 December 2016 07:23 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: >> >>>> I agree. Dynamic switch part is buggy, we can start with not >>>> allowing interfaces resulting in dynamic switch. >>> >>> Does this mean that when bringing up multiple interfaces, users would >>> need to figure out the 'magic' order that works? >> >> I think we need to talk about hardware capabilities at this point. > > QCA988X does not have capability to configure vif specific decap mode. Encap mode > is configurable per packet for all the ath10k based chips so this part should be > fine to support per vif configuration. Newer QCA chips like QCA9984, QCA4019, QCA9888 > and QCA99X0 supports decap mode configuration per vif. When you say "all" are you also taking into account QCA6174 and QCA9377? Just checking... -- Kalle Valo
