On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 15:53 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > > Perhaps we could live with this being done only for the fast-xmit > > case? > I don't think we should pass padded vs non-padded frames depending on > whether fast-xmit was used. The non-fast-xmit codepath could simply > do the memmove at the end of the tx handlers though. I guess that's fair. Would it be sufficent though? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
