On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 17:15 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > Perhaps we could live with this being done only for the fast-xmit > > > case? > > I don't think we should pass padded vs non-padded frames depending > > on > > whether fast-xmit was used. The non-fast-xmit codepath could simply > > do the memmove at the end of the tx handlers though. > I guess that's fair. Would it be sufficent though? > So it turns out the patch 1/2 actually makes the code *bigger* for some reason. Janusz, can you see if the above suggestion would be good enough? Hopefully high-tpt cases would all run through fast-xmit anyway. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
