On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 21:05 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:52:13PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > Hmm. Why does busy exist then? Historical accident? I really really > > Yes it's historical baggage. These days the biggest users would > be LLTX drivers which should all be converted to non-LLTX and > drivers that don't keep track of queue status properly. Hmmm mmmm. I'll clean it up later, it gets easier with my patch that puts the control info into skb->cb so I'll do that later in a separate patch. The way I see it, this is actually *correct* from a "what hits the air" point of view and the current code is crappy. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
