> Yes, that would be a reasonable option - providing that we have the rate > (which we should - there is a WARN_ON(1) in rx-path if it is not set correctly) the packet is also dropped in that case so you don't see it. > As I think about that, I would suggest: > - no sta info is being collected prior to join/create > - sta entry is added/updated on each beacon with reported rateset > - sta entry is added/updated on data frames with just the received-rate Want to do the patch? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
