Johannes Berg wrote: >> Yes, that would be a reasonable option - providing that we have the rate >> (which we should - there is a WARN_ON(1) in rx-path if it is not set correctly) > > the packet is also dropped in that case so you don't see it. Oh yes. Should have read one more line of code :) > >> As I think about that, I would suggest: >> - no sta info is being collected prior to join/create >> - sta entry is added/updated on each beacon with reported rateset >> - sta entry is added/updated on data frames with just the received-rate > > Want to do the patch? I'll try. Hope we have rx-rate on hand where needed :) Vlado
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
