Hi, I've got no real reason to work on configfs rather than cfg80211 beside loving the idea of configuring my wireless through a filesystem... and also it seemed to be rather straightforward so I thought it was a good way to enter linux kernel hacking. I have no problem working on the cfg80211 API if it's what really needs work now. I'll take a look at the current todo-list. Maxime. 2008/4/30 Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Maxime, > > > > > I'm willing to work on the linux kernel, and I thought that a configfs > > interface for the cfg80211 module would be great, I would like to know > > if someone is already working on that, and if there is any reason not > > to do it. > > Well, the foremost reason not to do configfs it is that even nl80211 > doesn't really offer much functionality yet. Is there any specific > reason why you want configfs rather than netlink? Would you want to work > on adding more cfg80211 API (especially for STA MLME)? > > johannes > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
