Hi Maxime, > I'm willing to work on the linux kernel, and I thought that a configfs > interface for the cfg80211 module would be great, I would like to know > if someone is already working on that, and if there is any reason not > to do it. Well, the foremost reason not to do configfs it is that even nl80211 doesn't really offer much functionality yet. Is there any specific reason why you want configfs rather than netlink? Would you want to work on adding more cfg80211 API (especially for STA MLME)? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
