Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> "closed" is rather misleading, since you most certainly should *not* >>do >>>> dev_close() [and don't, but how should I know reading the commit >>log?] >>>> >>>> johannes >>>> >>> >>> Yes, I see. >>> I meant that actually stop_ap leaves device in state similar to >>ndo_stop, >>> where it is non operational. >>> >>> Would you suggest better wording? "Inactive", "down", "non >>operational" >>> or something else? >> >>Isn't "down" good enough here? So can I change it to: > > Well that kinda proves my point - down is wrong. > > Carrier turned off is probably the right thing to do here. Ok, I change the commit log to: cfg80211_ops.stop_ap supposed to have interface carried turned off as post condition. Fulfill this requirement. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
