Vladimir Kondratiev <QCA_vkondrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Monday, March 30, 2015 10:45:56 AM Johannes Berg wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 11:28 +0300, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: >> > cfg80211_ops.stop_ap supposed to have interface closed >> > as post condition. Fulfill this requirement. >> >> "closed" is rather misleading, since you most certainly should *not* do >> dev_close() [and don't, but how should I know reading the commit log?] >> >> johannes >> > > Yes, I see. > I meant that actually stop_ap leaves device in state similar to ndo_stop, > where it is non operational. > > Would you suggest better wording? "Inactive", "down", "non operational" > or something else? Isn't "down" good enough here? So can I change it to: cfg80211_ops.stop_ap supposed to have interface down as post condition. Fulfill this requirement. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
