On Monday, March 30, 2015 10:45:56 AM Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 11:28 +0300, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: > > cfg80211_ops.stop_ap supposed to have interface closed > > as post condition. Fulfill this requirement. > > "closed" is rather misleading, since you most certainly should *not* do > dev_close() [and don't, but how should I know reading the commit log?] > > johannes > Yes, I see. I meant that actually stop_ap leaves device in state similar to ndo_stop, where it is non operational. Would you suggest better wording? "Inactive", "down", "non operational" or something else? Thanks, Vladimir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
