Search Linux Wireless

Re: ath10k to ath9k IBSS, ath9k has interface-combinations issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/06/2015 10:17 PM, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
> On 7 April 2015 at 07:12, Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 7 April 2015 at 02:39, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Has anyone tried running ath10k to ath9k IBSS?
>>>
>>> I'm trying this with a somewhat hacked 4.0-rc6 kernel,
>>> and latest wpa_supplicant.
>>>
>>> ath9k to ath9k works with and without encryption, and ath10k to ath10k works
>>> (w/out encryption at least).
>>>
>>> But, if I try to tell ath10k to connect to ath9k, then the ath9k reports
>>> interface combinations
>>> issues and will not associate.  I've added some debug, and the issue is the
>>> 'num==0' part here:
>>>
>>>
>>> int cfg80211_check_combinations(struct wiphy *wiphy,
>>>                                 const int num_different_channels,
>>>                                 const u8 radar_detect,
>>>                                 const int iftype_num[NUM_NL80211_IFTYPES])
>>> {
>>>         int err, num = 0;
>>>
>>>         err = cfg80211_iter_combinations(wiphy, num_different_channels,
>>>                                          radar_detect, iftype_num,
>>>                                          cfg80211_iter_sum_ifcombs, &num);
>>>         if (err) {
>>>                 pr_info("cfg-comb-check: failed to iterate combinations\n");
>>>                 return err;
>>>         }
>>>         if (num == 0) {
>>>                 pr_info("cfg-comb-check: iter-combinations returned
>>> num==0\n");
>>>                 return -EBUSY;
>>>         }
>>>
>>>         return 0;
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_check_combinations);
>>>
>>> There should be exactly one interface on this radio that is admin-up, and it
>>> is the
>>> one that I am trying to make run in adhoc mode.
>>>
>>> Any ideas on this?
>>
>> IBSS with non-fixed or dfs channel? It would bump
>> num_different_channels and yield no valid combinations. But why would
>> that work fine with, e.g. ath9k-ath9k otherwise - no idea.
>>
> 
> Check this discussion (ibss + p2p_device - this could be one you hit).
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg134447.html

That patch is in my tree already, so must be something else.

Thanks,
Ben

> 
> BR
> Janusz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux