On 26 January 2015 at 10:25, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 10:19 +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
>> On 26 January 2015 at 10:00, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 10:37 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote:
>> >
>> >> >> Shouldn't you also set vht_oper->basic_mcs_set here? Of course if you
>> >> >> have no use for it in IBSS I can add it later.
>> >> >
>> >> > Why would you want to require VHT rates?
>> >>
>> >> Are you sure it's required and no the other way around in this case?
>> >> As in specifying which rates are not supported.
>> >> Not sure it means the same thing as in the HT instance.
>> >
>> > Well, it does mean the same thing ("these rates are required") but it's
>> > encoded in a way that you have to set it to all-ones (rather than
>> > all-zeroes) to mean "no requirements", so in that sense you're right.
>> >
>>
>> I already set this in the patch:
>> + vht_oper->basic_mcs_set = vht_cap->vht_mcs.rx_mcs_map;
>
> But do you really want to require the local capabilities as basic MCSes?
>
I am not sure. Will check spec and how we do that for an AP.
BR
Janusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
