On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 10:19 +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
> On 26 January 2015 at 10:00, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 10:37 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote:
> >
> >> >> Shouldn't you also set vht_oper->basic_mcs_set here? Of course if you
> >> >> have no use for it in IBSS I can add it later.
> >> >
> >> > Why would you want to require VHT rates?
> >>
> >> Are you sure it's required and no the other way around in this case?
> >> As in specifying which rates are not supported.
> >> Not sure it means the same thing as in the HT instance.
> >
> > Well, it does mean the same thing ("these rates are required") but it's
> > encoded in a way that you have to set it to all-ones (rather than
> > all-zeroes) to mean "no requirements", so in that sense you're right.
> >
>
> I already set this in the patch:
> + vht_oper->basic_mcs_set = vht_cap->vht_mcs.rx_mcs_map;
But do you really want to require the local capabilities as basic MCSes?
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
