Kalle Valo wrote: > Yeah, but everyone want higher throughput (including me). So what value > is best in your opinion? Lower throughput has been okay for all this time, with a value of 16. I suppose the value can be retained to not cause regressions on AP135 or other platforms with a low-powered CPU. As Michal mentioned, this value allows AP135 to function without the watchdog rebooting the board. Sujith -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
