Hi Sujith, On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Sujith Manoharan <sujith@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kalle Valo wrote: >> Yeah, but everyone want higher throughput (including me). So what value >> is best in your opinion? > > Lower throughput has been okay for all this time, with a value > of 16. I suppose the value can be retained to not cause regressions > on AP135 or other platforms with a low-powered CPU. As Michal mentioned, > this value allows AP135 to function without the watchdog rebooting > the board. Can we detect if this parameter is too high / low and adjust / limit it on the fly? Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
