Sujith Manoharan <sujith@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Sujith Manoharan wrote: >> None. The default stays the same. But, it can be adjusted based >> on the platform, if higher throughput is desired. > > But, anyway, this patch can be dropped. We'll change the fill level > restriction internally, based on the customer's platform. I'm sad to hear that, now others cannot benefit from your work. What was wrong with my proposal? Would it help if I write an RFC patch? Just tell me what HTT fill value I should use. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
