On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 15:39 +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > Does it really make sense to ask the driver to do "automatic"? After > > all, there are other limits in mac80211 (like 11h from the AP and > > regulatory) that need to be considered. So perhaps if userspace says > > "automatic", the driver should still see only "limited"? > > > > IMHO "automatic" means lower driver has to take into account just > channel/regulatory constraints (that is ath9k behavior), since the > user/mac80211 does not cap TX power, whereas "limited" means the > user/mac80211 has set a limit for emitted power, so that configuration > has to be taken into account. Well, mac80211 always gives you a max TX power value though - and if it's only the maximum regulatory permitted on that channel. So there's always a valid upper bound - unlike the userspace API where "automatic" means that you have no idea of an upper bound. Inside the kernel you always have an upper bound, so "automatic" doesn't make that much sense? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
