> > > John, Johannes, what will be the preferred way to continue? it seems > > > that Ivo and Michael agree that the adjustments needed can be inserted > > > quite fast. would you like to re-base and merge the current RFC as a > > > patch and fix things on top of it, or to merge all the fixes and push > > > it at once? > > > > I'd like to take a look at it first, though if you tested it and it > > works we can just as well put it into -testing, it can't really be worse > > than what we have now. > > > > What I'd like to do though is just make mac80211 depend on > > NETDEVICES_MULTIQUEUE (or select it if possible?) so we don't have to > > bother with all the ifdefs. OTOH that'll totally break compat so Luis?NETDEVICES_MULTIQUEUE > > I've been reviewing this for a bit now and I think if we make mac80211 > depend on NETDEVICES_MULTIQUEUE and just have compat.diff patch the > sources with ifdefs where needed. The file include/linux/netdevice.h > already provides hints as to how to port over some calls but won't be > sure until we test this. Seems we need a new patch for this anyway. > Once posted I can try to port on compat-wireless. > > Luis thanks Luis. Johannes, i guess it's back to previous mail - should we put this into testing and let us all patch on top of it (with a heads-up notice of course to everyone) ? Ron -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
