On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > John, Johannes, what will be the preferred way to continue? it seems > > that Ivo and Michael agree that the adjustments needed can be inserted > > quite fast. would you like to re-base and merge the current RFC as a > > patch and fix things on top of it, or to merge all the fixes and push > > it at once? > > I'd like to take a look at it first, though if you tested it and it > works we can just as well put it into -testing, it can't really be worse > than what we have now. > > What I'd like to do though is just make mac80211 depend on > NETDEVICES_MULTIQUEUE (or select it if possible?) so we don't have to > bother with all the ifdefs. OTOH that'll totally break compat so Luis?NETDEVICES_MULTIQUEUE I've been reviewing this for a bit now and I think if we make mac80211 depend on NETDEVICES_MULTIQUEUE and just have compat.diff patch the sources with ifdefs where needed. The file include/linux/netdevice.h already provides hints as to how to port over some calls but won't be sure until we test this. Seems we need a new patch for this anyway. Once posted I can try to port on compat-wireless. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
