> -----Original Message----- > From: mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Luis R. > Rodriguez > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 20:38 > To: Peer, Ilan; Jeff Johnson > Cc: Spinadel, David; linux-wireless; wireless-regdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jouni > Malinen; Ginsburg, Noam; Perelmooter, Liraz; Shalev, Oz; Michael Green > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [RFC] cfg80211: Enable GO operation on additional > channels > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not- > panic.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Peer, Ilan <ilan.peer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> It was unclear for what exact channels you needed to deal with here. > >>> Given review so far wouldn't it just be DFS flagged channels on some > >>> UNII bands ? Then again if the indoor flag needs to be pegged to to > >>> a specific UNII band and we can do that on wireless-regdb do we even > >>> need the UNII band check routine helper? > >>> > >> > >> Generally it is possible that the indoor property is not pegged to > >> the 'other_channel', or it is possible that it is pegged but they are > >> not in the same UNII band, so the verification is still needed. I > >> guess that once I get the list you requested things will be clearer > >> :) > > > > OK so there are exceptions to the indoor flag affecting GO under these > > rules or not. Looking forward to the respin. > > Anxiously looking forward to the respin :D > Me too ;) ... unfortunately I did not get a chance to work on this in the last couple of months. Hope I'll get to it this week or the next. Sorry for not updating earlier ... Regards, Ilan. ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���zW����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
