On 12/12/2012 02:08 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 13:54 -0800, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> We saw logs fill with this (at very high speeds): cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0 cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0 cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0 cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0 cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0 cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0 cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0 cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0 cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0 cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0 cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0 cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0 Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/wireless/reg.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c index 6e53089..8aa7867 100644 --- a/net/wireless/reg.c +++ b/net/wireless/reg.c @@ -2067,11 +2067,12 @@ int regulatory_hint_found_beacon(struct wiphy *wiphy, if (!reg_beacon) return -ENOMEM; - REG_DBG_PRINT("Found new beacon on "Why not just disable the config option for it if you don't care?
I don't mind seeing it, just don't want thousands of them in my logs in a very short amount of time. Maybe I was just hitting some other bug, and there is no valid reason for this to ever spam? Thanks, Ben
johannes
-- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
